Jitendar Canth(Reviewer) posted this on Thursday, 29th August 2013, 13:36
Seen that TV series, The Dome?
Just build an impenetrable, radiation proof wall around the Middle East, leave it for 50 years, then break it down and take advantage of all that depopulated land that will magically appear (after clearing away the corpses)
=========================== Jitendar Canth
Quote: "I thought what I`d do was, I`d pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes."
bandicoot(Elite) posted this on Thursday, 29th August 2013, 14:57
The answer is no and keep political pressure up.
As for chemicals being used, are they really being used?, is this just another manipulated reason for us being involved in more war?
Well I think our MP`s will not be dupped again, by non-existant weapons of mass destruction, and going into the illegal wars of Iraq and Afganistan. We still have Blair needing to account for his crimes, the guy who turned Catholic instantly when leaving office, to help his dammed soul, no chance!
I say if Cameron and his cronies are so quick at wanting to fight, send them and their sons and daughters only as mercinaries.
RE: Should we intervene in Syria?
Jitendar Canth(Reviewer) posted this on Thursday, 29th August 2013, 15:03
They were sprayed with chemtrails, not chemical weapons.
=========================== Jitendar Canth
Quote: "I thought what I`d do was, I`d pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes."
bandicoot(Elite) posted this on Thursday, 29th August 2013, 15:15
Quote: To Jitaendar quote They were sprayed with chemtrails, not chemical weapons. There is no need to be derogatory towards me on such a subject as war.
Chemitrails are not the subject here, War death and destruction is.
If you cannot contribute to such an important subject, then you would be better not posting at all.
This item was edited on Thursday, 29th August 2013, 16:45
RE: Should we intervene in Syria?
mbilko(Elite) posted this on Thursday, 29th August 2013, 16:15
If I was 100% certain they have used chemical weapons on their own kind (and I am pretty close) I would send in a team and assassinate him and make his lackeys know the next leader is next if they don`t sort themselves out.
RE: Should we intervene in Syria?
Pete-MK(Elite Donator) posted this on Thursday, 29th August 2013, 17:10
I had to click `Not Sure`, purely for the reason Assad is too well supported by Russia & China, and any strike against Syria would **** off two of the greatest superpowers on the planet. It`s a stalemate, with everyone watching who will make the first move.
MADTheOgster(Elite Donator) posted this on Thursday, 29th August 2013, 18:00
if the UN gets the proof it needs regarding chemical weapons then surely we have a legal & moral obligation to intervene ?
But, to be clear, this should be decided & acted on by the UN, not a tin pot idea by the UK & USA to go in alone,
]
RE: Should we intervene in Syria?
dkuk2000(Elite) posted this on Thursday, 29th August 2013, 18:04
Quote: Pete-MK says... I had to click `Not Sure`, purely for the reason Assad is too well supported by Russia & China, and any strike against Syria would **** off two of the greatest superpowers on the planet. It`s a stalemate, with everyone watching who will make the first move. I agree, It`s bad enough Kim Jong-un with his obsession with nukes let alone Russia & China in bed with Assad. It seems that were too eager to follow the US these days without considering the possible consequences.
] 
