Info and forum posts by 'Krenn'
This user hasn't used our main site yet, so has no main account at present.
Joined on: Wednesday, 27th July 2005, 03:53, Last used: Friday, 2nd December 2005, 00:17
Access Level: Harmless
About this user: This user has chosen not to submit a description :(
This user has posted a total of 5 messages. On average, since joining, this user has posted 0 messages a day, or 0 messages a week. In the last 30 days, this user has posted 0 messages, which is on average 0 messages a day.
Recent Messages Posted:
RE: MoreGremlins
I grem per email address -- sign in a new account with a different email and create it there.
Let`s make this easy...
Okay -- so to avoid making challenges to those who want to refuse me (certainly your right to do so) and from having guys like One Eyed Willy take offense to me giving him 189 points in three fights, how about if I just throw my challenges out on the table. Yours for the taking. First ten for each of my grems gets the challenges -- I`ll consume the leftovers. For those who haven`t figured it out yet -- my grems are Bill IV, Clyde Crusher, Morley`s Pup, SpitChokenSneeze, Aunt LaVerne, Stanley P. Kachawski, and Hermey the Dentist. For anyone who has low strength, I will use at most `normal` tactics -- `conserve energy` if it makes sense. If you want challenges from all, please say that -- and if you don`t want challenges from some of them, let me know that too.
I won`t be around for a few hours after the new challenges are out tonight -- but I will deal them all out appropriately when I get home.
I think it goes without saying that those who have refused won`t be getting any of these.
RE: Top 5 a bunch of whimps
baked said...
Quote:
Yep They ALL challenged me today. They are in the top 5 Me # 16. Picking on the lil guy. AGAIN
OK -- so maybe me handing out all the challenges wasn`t such a good idea -- it may just be that "playing with myself" is more fun!! -- got numerous refusals (a total of 4 from one grem) from a muscle-bound guy (4000+ strength) on challenges from my top 4 all with strength less than 3000 -- no biggie -- I lost four fights but you lost a ton of points!! I won`t call you out -- you know who you are -- and don`t worry -- none of the army will bother you again.
As for you "baked" -- this just makes me mad -- you can`t even be honest in trying to slam me. First of all -- you received ONLY three challenges from my grems -- not from "ALL" as you claim -- Aunt Laverne who is ranked #6 -- I won and received 82 points -- you lost and received 92 points -- Stanley P. Kachawski who is ranked #7 -- I lost and received 8 points -- you won and received 52 points -- and from Hermey the Dentist ranked #9 -- I won and received 52 points -- you lost and received 35 points.
So -- you see -- 10 challenges below #6 goes from #7 through #16 -- I own 7 and 9 so I actually went a little deeper too. There were NO GREMS in the top 5 as you accuse -- and you got 1 win, 179 XP, and a total of 189 points with the 10 for the win. I got 2 wins, 142 XP, for a total of 162 points. Looks like you got the better of the exchange -- but you still feel the need to whine like a baby. Fine -- don`t worry -- no challenges from any of the grems -- I won`t bother you at all any longer.
By the way -- how did your challenges of Gaybar, Skivings, etc go?? They`re about the same distance away (you #16, Skiving #24 -- 8 places different -- Hermey #9, you #16 -- 7 places different) as what you and I were -- only difference being that your strength is WAY higher than those guys.
Geeesh -- you go ahead and collect the 20 to 30 points from beating those guys senseless with your challenges -- and I`m more than happy to take the 35, 52, and 92 points you earned on MY challenges away. No problem!
RE: And to make matters worse the last 3 to be started were almost immediately terminated
It would be a great idea -- it`s only a few pixels away from "Accept" and judging from the number of times I see the apologies on here, it`s pretty easy to mess it up.
RE: Oh I am going to start refusing fights now, yeah this new XP table thing sucks
The reason that it is unfair is because it took affect with everyone having gremlins which were be `built` using the old system. I seriously wonder if RJS shouldn`t just commit mass murder and let everyone start over from the beginning. By doing this in the middle of everyones` lives, some grems have extreme advantages over others -- the bad news is that the ones that used to be disadvantaged (high strength) are the winners while the ones that used to be advantaged (high dex/stamina) are the BIG losers.
The reason is clear -- high dex/stamina allow you to go 20 rounds -- but it also means minimal damage. Those who currently have high strength can now engage these grems and get the full 20 round fight -- but do much more damage with their 3 or so hits -- thus total points for the match are 80-something -- and the high strength guys get a major proportion of those points.
If we were all on a level playing field at the start of this, I think we`d find the right mix of attributes and we`d see more 50-30 and 45-35 scores and less 85-0 scores because a few grems were suddenly given extreme advantage. I`m with the other guy -- any conans challenge me because I can make a 20-round fight, I`ll refuse before I give them all the points.