Reality TV - The 21st Century Freak Show

Inline Image
If you know anything about me it's that, aside from sport and films, I basically don't watch television. There are the odd TV shows that I'll tune into but generally what passes for popular culture is a mystery to me. When I was watching the extended version of Have I Got News For You there was a piece on a middle-aged woman being sneered at and mocked before demonstrating that she could sing, which seemed to make it all better. There was some debate over a possible make-over following a quoted line about the state of her eyebrows. This got me thinking whether we, as a society, have moved on a great deal in the past century or two.

Time was that people with odd talents, appearances and behaviour patterns were put in carnivals, sideshows or a circus and labelled 'freaks'. It seems that the dingy freak circus of the sort portrayed in The Elephant Man has moved to prime time television with judges and a studio audience.

Furthermore, 'normal' people are selected to spend weeks together in a house shut off from outside communication from their every move being scrutinised and broadcast live before being put up for public vote. Z-list celebrities travel to the Australian outback and humiliate themselves for public amusement in the hope of resurrecting a flagging career.

Inline Image


In a similar vein, people who think they have a skill put themselves up to be mocked, sneered at and humiliated on stage for the entire world to see in the hope of making it big.  If this weren't enough, there are the 'chat show' formats where people are invited on to be torn apart by the studio audience.  Robert Kilroy-Silk arguably started it in the UK with Jeremy Kyle apparently perfecting the art of insult and character assassination turning it into something more akin to the Christian being thrown to the lions in the Roman Amphitheatre.  On the other side of the pond, you have Maury Povich, Geraldo and, the king of them all, Jerry Springer.  The weirder the guest the better and if the paternity test identifies the wrong person and a fight breaks out, all the better.

There was a period last year when civil wars, genocide, famine and other massive news stories were shunted off the front page and the main bulletin because of the furore around the 'Strictly Come Sergeant' when a (once?) respected political commentator was all over the news because he couldn't dance very well!

Inline Image


As I said at the start, I barely watch television but this failed to escape my attention. Aside from the first Big Brother, I have never watched one of these shows but, from what I've read and the brief clips I've seen, it just seems to me that the sideshow has moved to the mainstream.

Your Opinions and Comments

8 / 10
There was a day earlier this week where the Today programme's coverage of the day's major events: the MP's expenses scandal, the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre and Barack Obama's trip to Egypt was interspersed with two discussions of what happened on the final of Britain's Got Talent and Susan Boyle's admission to The Priory with 'exhaustion'.  It's come to something where Radio 4's flagship news programme discusses the rights and wrongs of how a middle-aged talent show contestant was treated and whether Talkback Thames bore any responsibility for what happened.
 
I can understand one mention, but they ended the programme with a five-minute debate about what happened and whether it was preventable.  You know that something's gone wrong when they don't finish it with wondering what will happen in China or Egypt or which minister is next for the chop, but chatting about the mental health of a singer on a TV show!  I didn't see it, I don't watch it and I'm not going to.
posted by David Beckett on 5/6/2009 12:03
If you ask me, Freak Show TV sums up the current output on all channels perfectly.  The reality tv stuff is bad enough, but I really loathe those shows that Five delights in doing that masquerade as uplifting human interest stories (like the half-ton man, the kid with no skin, the woman whose tumour weighs more than she does).  They're nothing of the sort.  They're there for people to gawp at these poor unfortunates just like the old freak shows, but safe in the respectability of watching a "human interest documentary"  Bullsh*t.  If they were serious about concern for the welfare of the subject of the programme, they'd come up with a more sensitive title than the roll-up-roll-up-see-the-bearded-lady style of title they employ.

Sadly there are millions of people who lap up reality tv (BGT's viewing figures prove it), and the tv companies will happily show anything to chase viewing figures.
posted by Mark Oates on 5/6/2009 15:53